Current:Home > FinanceAmazon must pay over $30 million over claims it invaded privacy with Ring and Alexa -Elevate Profit Vision
Amazon must pay over $30 million over claims it invaded privacy with Ring and Alexa
View
Date:2025-04-17 02:49:58
Amazon will pay more than $30 million in fines to settle alleged privacy violations involving its voice assistant Alexa and doorbell camera Ring, according to federal filings.
In one lawsuit, the Federal Trade Commission claims the tech company violated privacy laws by keeping recordings of children's conversations with its voice assistant Alexa, and in another that its employees have monitored customers' Ring camera recordings without their consent.
The FTC alleges Amazon held onto children's voice and geolocation data indefinitely, illegally used it to improve its algorithm and kept transcripts of their interactions with Alexa despite parents' requests to delete them.
The alleged practices would violate the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act, or COPPA, which requires online companies to alert and obtain consent from parents when they gather data for children under age 13 and allow parents to delete the data at will.
In addition to the $25 million civil penalty, Amazon would not be able to use data that has been requested to be deleted. The company also would have to remove children's inactive Alexa accounts and be required to notify its customers about the FTC's actions against the company.
"Amazon's history of misleading parents, keeping children's recordings indefinitely, and flouting parents' deletion requests violated COPPA and sacrificed privacy for profits," said Samuel Levine, director of the FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection, in a statement. "COPPA does not allow companies to keep children's data forever for any reason, and certainly not to train their algorithms."
Until September 2019, Alexa's default settings were to store recordings and transcripts indefinitely. Amazon said it uses the recordings to better understand speech patterns and respond to voice commands, the complaint says.
After the FTC intervened at the time, Amazon added a setting to automatically delete data after three or 18 months, but still kept the indefinite setting as the default.
Amazon said in a statement it disagrees with the FTC's findings and does not believe it violated any laws.
"We take our responsibilities to our customers and their families very seriously," it said. "We have consistently taken steps to protect customer privacy by providing clear privacy disclosures and customer controls, conducting ongoing audits and process improvements, and maintaining strict internal controls to protect customer data."
The company said it requires parental consent for all children's profiles, provides a Children's Privacy Disclosure elaborating on how it uses children's data, allows child recordings and transcripts to be deleted in the Alexa app and erases child profiles that have been inactive for at least 18 months.
More than 800,000 children under age 13 have their own Alexa accounts, according to the complaint.
The FTC claims that when these issues were brought to Amazon's attention, it did not take action to remedy them.
In a separate lawsuit, the FTC seeks a $5.8 million fine for Amazon over claims employees and contractors at Ring — a home surveillance company Amazon bought in 2018 — had full access to customers' videos.
Amazon is also accused of not taking its security protections seriously, as hackers were able to break into two-way video streams to sexually proposition people, call children racial slurs and physically threaten families for ransom.
Despite this, the FTC says, Ring did not implement multi-factor authentication until 2019.
In addition to paying the $5.8 million, which will be issued as customer refunds, Ring would have to delete customers' videos and faces from before 2018, notify customers about the FTC's actions and report any unauthorized access to videos to the FTC.
"Ring's disregard for privacy and security exposed consumers to spying and harassment," Levine said. "The FTC's order makes clear that putting profit over privacy doesn't pay."
The proposed orders require approval from federal judges.
veryGood! (82)
Related
- Head of the Federal Aviation Administration to resign, allowing Trump to pick his successor
- 'Built by preppers for preppers': See this Wisconsin compound built for off-the-grid lifestyles
- Margot Robbie Trades Barbie Pink for Shimmering Black at the 2024 Oscars
- Nationwide review finds patchwork, ‘broken’ systems for resolving open records disputes
- A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
- Iowa vs. Michigan: Caitlin Clark leads Hawkeyes to Big Ten tournament final
- Hailee Steinfeld Proves All That Glitters Is Gold With Stunning 2024 Oscars Look
- Vanessa Hudgens Is Pregnant, Expecting Baby with Husband Cole Tucker
- Sam Taylor
- Behind the scenes with the best supporting actor Oscar nominees ahead of the 2024 Academy Awards ceremony
Ranking
- A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
- West Virginia bill letting teachers remove ‘threatening’ students from class heads to governor
- Great Barrier Reef undergoing mass coral bleaching event for 5th time in nearly a decade
- After the strikes: Fran Drescher on the outlook for labor in Hollywood
- Could your smelly farts help science?
- Liverpool fans serenade team with 'You'll Never Walk Alone' rendition before Man City match
- Where does menthol cigarette ban stand? Inside the high-stakes battle at Biden's door.
- Ryan Gosling, Emma Stone and More Oscar Nominees at Their First Academy Awards
Recommendation
Taylor Swift Eras Archive site launches on singer's 35th birthday. What is it?
No. 1 South Carolina wins SEC Tournament over No. 8 LSU 79-72 in game marred by skirmish, ejections
The Daily Money: Will TikTok be banned in US?
Iowa vs. Michigan: Caitlin Clark leads Hawkeyes to Big Ten tournament final
'As foretold in the prophecy': Elon Musk and internet react as Tesla stock hits $420 all
Becky G's Sultry 2024 Oscars Ensemble Is One You Need to See
Becky G's Sultry 2024 Oscars Ensemble Is One You Need to See
Princess of Wales appears in first photo since surgery amid wild speculation of her whereabouts